检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]京都大学大学院 [2]西南交通大学人文社会科学学院,四川成都610031
出 处:《西南交通大学学报(社会科学版)》2010年第4期132-139,共8页Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University(Social Sciences)
基 金:中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(SWJTU09ZT40)
摘 要:农民集体土地所有权的性质和构造是牵涉到农民土地权益保障的基本制度。保障农民土地权益的关键是将集体成员与集体土地所有权的各种权能对接,这就需要突破罗马法传统的所有权框架,以日耳曼法的总有理论为基础分析和构造集体土地所有权。在总有的所有权框架中,农民集体作为所有权的主体,各个集体成员依据其成员资格而非通过他物权的设定享有对集体土地的使用、收益权,并通过民主的形式行使对集体土地的管理和处分权能。在这方面,日本运用总有理论对其入会权制度的整理具有一定的借鉴价值。The character and structure of peasants' collective land ownership is the basic institution involving peasants' interest guaranty in land. The key of ensuring peasants' interest in land is that every capacity of peasants' collective land ownership can be connected with every member of rural collective, which would break the framework of Roman law's traditional ownership, and be based on aggregate ownership theory to analyze and structure our collective land ownership. In the aggregate ownership framework, rural collective is the subject of ownership and each member of rural collective enjoys the right to use and the income of collective land not through the establishment of jura in re aliena but on the basis of their qualification. Japan's aggregate ownership's effect on regulating the right of common can provide valuable reference.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7