检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]昆明医学院第三附属医院(云南省肿瘤医院)大肠癌临床治疗中心,650031
出 处:《国际护理学杂志》2010年第6期901-903,共3页international journal of nursing
摘 要:目的探讨围手术期进行舒适护理对进展期(T3、T4)中低位直肠癌术后生活质量的影响。方法对2006年10月至2008年10月期间我院60例中低位直肠癌患者进行研究,将所有病例随机分为观察组和对照组,各30例,对照组予以常规护理,观察组在术前、术后采用舒适护理方式,评价并比较两组术后住院满意度、住院天数及生活质量情况。结果观察组住院满意度为96.7%,对照组为76.7%,两组差异明显,具有统计学意义(P〈0.05);观察组住院天数为14.5d,对照组为24.6d,两组比较P〈0.05,术后疼痛、饮食、睡眠、社会生活等生活质量方面明显优于对照组(P〈0.05),差异具有统计学意义。结论围手术期舒适护理可明显增强进展期中低位直肠癌根治术后患者的舒适程度,增加满意度,促进患者术后尽早康复,提高生活质量。Objective To explore effect of comfortable nursing in pefioperative period on life quality after operation in patients with mid -low locally advanced recal cancer. Methods Sixty patients with mid -low locally advanced recal cancer in our hospital from October 2006 to October 2008 were randomly divided into control group (n = 30) and observation group (n = 30) . Comfortable nursing care and routine pefioperative nursing care were respectively taken in the control and observation group. Results The degree of satisfaction were 96.7% and 76. 7% (P 〈0. 05 ) respectively in the control and observation groups, and hospital day were 14. 5 days and 24. 6 days respectively in the two groups. The quality of life in control group after operation was better than that in observation group ( P 〈 0. 05) . Conclusions Comfortable nursing in pefioperative period is able to significantly strengthen the comfortable degree in perioperative period and improve the quality of life after operation in patients with mid - low locally advanced recal cancer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15