检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广西师范学院资源与环境科学学院,广西南宁530001 [2]水利部水土保持监测中心,北京100053
出 处:《水土保持通报》2010年第3期100-103,共4页Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation
摘 要:20世纪末,开发建设项目水土保持方案的编报工作已经实现了规范化和制度化,但有不少的编制者在编制建设类和建设生产类项目的水土保持方案时往往出现失误。建设类和建设生产类项目的水土保持方案在很多方面都存在很大区别。根据多年编制两类水土保持方案的实践经验,总结出了这两类项目水土保持方案的编报工作在水土保持要求、服务年限、预测时段划分、防治目标等方面的异同,以防止在编报过程中出现水土流失量预测、水土保持措施体系以及水土保持监测等方面产生较大的偏差。Soil and water conservation programs have been institutionalized and standardized since the end of 20th century,but lots of practitioners make some mistakes when they work on the soil and water conservation program between construction projects and production and construction projects.There are many differences in the soil and water conservation program between construction projects and production and construction projects.Based on the year’s experience of making the program,we summarized the similarities and differences between construction projects and production and construction projects in view of service life,soil loss prediction,soil loss prevention target,and other aspects.This work may be helpful to avoid the mistakes in making soil and water conservation programs.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229