检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《武警医学》2010年第6期491-493,496,共4页Medical Journal of the Chinese People's Armed Police Force
摘 要:目的观察针刺腰神经根点辅以雀啄法治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效。方法将158例(经CT或MRI确诊)腰椎间盘突出症患者随机分为2组,以针刺腰神经根点、手法采用雀啄法治疗腰椎间盘突出症80例(治疗组),并设针刺传统腧穴78例(对照组)作为对照,观察2组疗效并进行比较。结果第1疗程末,治疗组痊愈率为43.8%,对照组痊愈率为25.6%,2组疗效比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);第2疗程末治疗组痊愈率为82.5%,对照组痊愈率为43.6%,2组疗效比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.005)。结论针刺腰神经根点、辅以雀啄手法治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效明显优于针刺传统腧穴。Objective To observe the clinical effect of curing the lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion (LIDP)in acupuncturing the nerve root points assisted with the bird peck method. Methods 158 cases of patients with LIDP (diagnosed by CT or MRI) were randomly devised into 2 groups. The treatment group ,contenning with 80 cases ,would be cured by acupuncturing the nerve root points assisted with the bird peck method ,while the control group ,contenning with 78 cases, would be cured by the acupuncturing the traditional acupoints . Then observe the different effects of the 2 groups and compare them. Results At the end of the first course of treatment, the cure rate was 43.8% in the treatment group and 25.6% in the confrol group difference(P 〈0.05). At the end of the second course of treatment, the cure rate in the treatment group reached 82.5% but was 43.6% in the control group. The difference between the two groups was very significant ( P 〈 0.005 ). Conclusions Acupuncturing the nerve root points assisted with the bird - pecking manipulation in treatment of LIDP is move effective than acupuncturing the traditions acupoints.
关 键 词:椎间盘移位/针灸疗法 腰椎间盘突出症 腰神经根点 雀啄法
分 类 号:R274.9[医药卫生—中西医结合]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222