检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙洁丽[1]
出 处:《成都理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2010年第2期46-51,共6页Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Social Sciences
摘 要:电子商务商业方法的传统保护方式存在明显不足,各主要发达国家顺应实践发展需要,相继调整其专利政策将电子商务商业方法纳入专利保护领域。但是反对授予商业方法专利的观点依然颇多。电子商务商业方法是否具有可专利性在理论与实践的层面上都具有讨论价值。从总收益与总成本的比较看,发达国家授予商业方法专利是有效率的。但是在授予商业方法专利的同时,各国立法需要平衡各种利益,需要注重维护公有领域,以实现法律所追求的公平、正义价值目标。There are obvious deficiencies about the traditional protection ways of E-commerce business methods.Adaptting to the development need of practice,the major developed countries adjust their patent policies succesively and grant E-commerce business method patents.However,there are many opposite opinions.In theory and practice the patentability of E-commerce business methods has the significance of discussion.In the view of the comparison of the total revenue and total cost,in the developed countries granting E-commerce business method patents is efficient.However,in the process of granting business method patents,national legislation needs to balance different interests,needs to focus on maintaining the public domain,and realizes fairness,and justice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.70