检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谢双伦[1] 王景峰[1] 聂如琼[1] 张晋康[1] 袁沃亮[1] 林永青[1]
机构地区:[1]广州中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院心内科,510120
出 处:《中华心律失常学杂志》2010年第3期216-218,共3页Chinese Journal of Cardiac Arrhythmias
基 金:中山大学青年教师基金(2008001)
摘 要:目的评价运动试验阳性(Duke评分≤-11分)患者中aVR及V1导联ST段变化对于左主干病变的预测价值。方法回顾性分析了96例(Duke评分≤-11分)运动试验阳性患者,在运动试验中aVR及V1导联ST段变化,并与冠状动脉造影(CAG)结果比较。结果单纯aVR导联ST段抬高,在诊断左主干病变的敏感性为85.5%,特异性47.t%,准确率62.5%;而aVR及V1导联ST段均抬高,且STaVB/STV1〉1时,在诊断左主干病变的敏感性为82.1%,特异性83.8%,准确率83.3%。结论在运动试验中aVR和V1导联ST段抬高(STaVa/STV1〉1),对左主干病变有较高的预测价值。Objective To evaluate the value of lead aVR and V1 on the exercise electrocardiogram for the detection of left main coronary artery disease ( LMCAS ) in patients with the positive EET result ( Duke scores≤ - 11 ). Methods Ninty-six patients with Duke score ≤ - 11 were retrospectively screened for pres- ence of ST-segment elevation in lead aVR and lead V1. Coronary arteriography (CAG) results were compared among different groups. Results Twenty-eight out of 96 were diagnosed as LMCAS. 24 out of 60 with ST-segment elevation in lead aVR and 26 out of 34 with ST-segment elevation in lead aVR and V1 ( STav/STv1 〉 1 ) were found to have LMCAS. Isolated exercise-induced ST elevation in lead aVR had a sensitivity of 85.5, a specificity of 47. 1% and an accuracy of 62. 5% in predicting LMCAS; ST-segment elevation in lead aVR and V1 ( STavR/STvl 〉 1 ) had a sensitivity of 82. 1% , a specificity of 83.8% and an accuracy of 83.3% in predicting LMCAS. Conclusion ST-segment elevation in lead aVR and V1 ( STavR/STV1〉 1 ) criteria has a high value in predicting LMCAS.
分 类 号:R541.4[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229