检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑仁杰[1]
机构地区:[1]厦门大学法学院
出 处:《金融论坛》2010年第7期27-32,共6页Finance Forum
摘 要:金融危机重创了全球经济,也让各国重新审视自身的金融监管制度,强化金融监管成为了各国的普遍共识。中国金融业虽然未在金融危机中遭受重创,但不断出现的金融创新对中国目前的分业监管和监管联席会议的模式提出了严峻的挑战。本文认为中国目前的金融监管存在功能性监管缺失、监管联席会议不具备决策职能和执行决策的能力、割裂金融监管与金融调控关系等问题。故本文提出:明确法律法规的授权,组建一个有明确法律权限、有实体组织的协调机构,以完善中国目前的金融监管制度。The fnancial crisis heavily hits the global economy and makes many countries carefully examine their own financial supervisory systems. To strengthen financial supervision becomes a common consensus. Although Chinese financial industry is not heavily hit by the financial crisis, the continuously emerging financial innovations are severe challenges to Chinese current approaches of separated financial supervision and supervision joint conference. This paper argues that there are such problems in Chinese current financial supervision: functional loss, supervision joint conference missing decision-making functions and the capacity of decision-making, separation of financial supervision and financial regulation, etc.. Therefore, the paper proposes that, to improve Chinese current financial supervision, it is necessary to clearly define the rights authorized by laws and set up a coordinating body with clear legal rights.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.234