先天性巨结肠患儿2种不同灌肠法的效果评价  

Evaluation of effect of two different enema methods in congenital megacolon children

作　　者：梁镝敏[1] 陈凤华[1] 何小玲[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东医学院附属医院小儿外科,湛江524001

出　　处：《中国实用护理杂志》2010年第7期11-13,共3页Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing

基　　金：湛江市科技攻关项目（2009C3109009）

摘　　要：目的探讨先天性巨结肠患儿2种不同灌肠法的效果评价。方法将70例先天性巨结肠患儿随机分为实验组和对照组各35例。对照组采用传统的回流灌肠法进行灌肠；实验组则实施系统的改良回流灌肠方法（应用负压引流瓶加自制肛管扶托固定,配合护理手法顺着结肠的走向轻柔按摩下腹部，必要时改变体位，进行回肠灌肠）。观察2组患儿术前平均灌肠时间、术后住院时间及洁肠的效果。结果实验组患儿术前平均灌肠时间及术后住院时间较对照组明显缩短，洁肠效果明显好于对照组。结论改良回流灌肠法可减少术前灌肠时间及术后住院时间，且洁肠效果好。Objective To explore the effect of two different enema methods in congenital megacolon children. Methods 70 cases of congenital megacolon children were randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group with 35 cases in each group respectively. The control group used traditional reflux-enema; The experimental group was implemented systemic and modified back reflux-enema （negative pressure drainage vessel to reflux-enema plus the padded-fixation of anal canals, cooperated with manual massage of lower abdomen along the direction of colon, if necessary, changed body position）. The average enema time, the postoperative hospital stay and the effect of cleaning the intestine in the two groups were observed. Results Compared with the control group, the average preoperative enema time and hospitalization time was significantly shorter, and intestine cleaning effect was better in the experimental group. Conclusions Modified reflux-enema could increase preoperative enema time and postoperative hospitalization time, and had good effect on cleaning intestine.

关 键 词：先天性巨结肠 回流灌肠法 洁肠效果 

分 类 号：R473.72[医药卫生—护理学]