吴梦窗杭州情词及“亡妾”“亡妓”辨说  

Analysis of Wu Mengchuang's Ci Written in Hangzhou and the Naming of Deceased Second Wife or Deceased Prostitute

作　　者：孙虹[1] 孙蒙[1] 

机构地区：[1]江南大学文学院,江苏无锡214122

出　　处：《江南大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2010年第3期92-97,101,共7页Journal of Jiangnan University：Humanities & Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：全国高校古籍整理委员会直接资助项目"梦窗词校注"(项目编号:0757)

摘　　要：文章对前贤总结的吴梦窗词作中十四首杭州情词进行了勘比剔抉,认同其中四首,另外加上三首相关情词,共七首词作构筑了杭州情词完足的"自证链";更正了前人关于杭州亡妾的成说,得出了较为严谨的结论:因为未成纳娶,所谓杭州亡妾实为杭州亡妓。前贤杭州情词归类的误差,主要是因为梦窗与苏州营妓的前期交往,与杭州亡妓多有重合之处。另外,写杭妓之作,时节并非全部在春,其时也略有在秋者。After an analysis of 14 love cis by Wu Mengchuang in Hangzhou,this paper argues that four of them,plus other three,constitute a self-contained frame of Hangzhou love cis.Moreover,this paper finds that the deceased lady simply refers to a prostitute instead of Wu＇s second wife.It also points out that all the Hangzhou cis are not written in spring,with autumn being sporadically inserted.

关 键 词：吴梦窗 杭州情词 亡妾 亡妓 

分 类 号：I207.23[文学—中国文学]