清代中国与二十世纪英美诗律话语规则的比较  

Comparing Discourse Rules of Versification both in Qing Dynasty and in Britain and America in the 20th Century

作　　者：李国辉[1] 

机构地区：[1]台州学院人文学院,浙江临海317000

出　　处：《江南大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2010年第3期111-114,119,共5页Journal of Jiangnan University：Humanities & Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题"音律与声律:二十世纪中国诗律观念变迁研究"(09HQZZ033)的成果之一

摘　　要：清代诗律著作和20世纪英美诗律著作在话语对象上,都具有广泛的适用性和延伸性,这是二者的一个相似之处。二者的差别在于,清代的诗律著作偏重技巧规则,强调诗律的示范功能,有中国古代的传统思想相伴随;20世纪英美诗律著作偏重理论探究,强调诗律的认识功能,不但有西方传统思想相伴随,而且与20世纪多种现代学科、思想发生融合。总的来说,从诗律著作的功能上看,清代诗律著作与后者扮演的是不同的角色形象;就理论品质来看,清代的诗律著作与后者相比存在着较大的理论差距。Metrical works both in Qing Dynasty and in Britain and America in the 20th century have some similarities in their wide applicability and extensibility over discourse objects.But they are also different in many ways：metrical works in Qing Dynasty pay more attention to technical regulation,emphasize the exemplary function of versification and are accompanied by traditional thoughts in ancient China;while those in Britain and America in the 20th century focus on theoretical exploration,attach importance to the cognitive roles of versification,are accompanied by Western traditional thoughts and bond with various modern disciplines and thoughts.In conclusion,in terms of the function,metrical works in Qing Dynasty and the latter play different parts respectively,while in terms of theoretical quality,metrical works in Qing Dynasty have a long way to go,comparing with the latter.

关 键 词：中国诗律话语 声律 音律 

分 类 号：I207.21[文学—中国文学]