检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈松洁[1] 彭立敏[1] 丁祖德[1] 李兴龙[1]
出 处:《江南大学学报(自然科学版)》2010年第3期308-313,共6页Joural of Jiangnan University (Natural Science Edition)
基 金:铁道部科技研究开发计划重大项目(2008G031-17)
摘 要:论述了隧道衬砌-围岩系统动力分析的理论及计算方法,采用激振函数模拟列车竖向移动荷载,建立岩溶段连拱隧道的三维有限差分计算模型,分析了拱梁和直梁两种不同溶腔跨越方案中隧道结构变形和受力特性的差异。计算结果表明,两种不同跨越方式下隧道衬砌结构受力变形均满足规范要求。就跨越梁结构本身的受力特性而言,拱梁结构略有优势;但从施工安全性和经济性角度综合考虑,推荐采用直梁跨越方案。A theory of dynamic theory and a numerical method for the lining structure of tunnels and surrounding rock systems are put forward.Based on the numerical simulation of vertical load induced by train with excitation function,a three-dimension finite difference model of multi-arch tunnel in karst region is established to study the differences of the force and deformation between arch beam and straight beam which are used to step across the solution crevice.The results show that both the force and deformation of tunnel structure of the two different modes meet the requirements of specifications.From the force characteristics of beam structure itself,the arch beam structure has obvious advantage.But in view of safety and economy in the process of construction,the straight beam is more suitable.
分 类 号:U451.3[建筑科学—桥梁与隧道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249