检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王明惠[1]
机构地区:[1]宁波大学,315211
出 处:《体育与科学》1999年第1期61-64,共4页Sports & Science
摘 要:本文通过对1997年浙江省体育术科高考宁波师院考点各项成绩的对比分析和乒乓球专项考试原始成绩的统计分析,认为乒乓球专项成绩远远优于其它项目,主要原因是其考试方法不够科学,评分标准明显偏低所致。因此,重新审定乒乓球考试方法和标准是深化我省体育术科高考改革中急待解决的重要课题之一。Through a comparative analysis of the results of the physical skill entrance examination items that were carried out in Ningbo Normal University of Zhejiang province in 1997, and a statistical analysis of the original marks of the table tennis test, this paper comes to a conclusion that the scores of table tennis are much higher than those of other items.The primary reason for it is that the approach adopted in the test is not so scientific and the standards of scoring are too low. Therefore, it is one of the most urgent tasks to re - examine the approach and the standards of table tennis test in order to develop the reform of physical skill entrance examination in Zhejiang province.
分 类 号:G807.4[文化科学—体育训练] G642.47[文化科学—运动人体科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15