期刊分层:期刊评价研究的历史社会学解析  

Journal Stratification:Analysis and Elucidation for Journal Evaluation Research from Viewpoint of Historical Sociology

作　　者：刘宇[1] 袁曦临[2] 叶继元[2] 

机构地区：[1]上海大学图书情报档案系,上海200444 [2]南京大学信息管理系,南京210093

出　　处：《图书情报工作》2010年第14期6-10,65,共6页Library and Information Service

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目"建立与完善哲学社会科学评价体系研究"(项目编号:04ZD031)研究成果之一

摘　　要：分层是一种客观现象,期刊亦可分层。我国期刊分层的主流方式经历基于行政级别到基于核心期刊的演变,这植根于深刻的历史社会背景。传统期刊分层存在三大缺陷,即分层目标和使用目背离、期刊结构的紧张、不能胜任科研成果评价。提出引入社会分层理论考察期刊层级,指出期刊分层对核心期刊理论的继承与发展。Stratification is an objective phenomenon in journals as well as in human society. The main mode of journal evaluation has transformed from administration-oriented to core journal theory. The transformation of evaluation mode is rooted deeply in the social-his- torical context in our country. The limitations of traditional journal stratification are analyzed from three aspects ： the object of journal stratification is inconsistent with the purpose of application, the structural strain in journals and the incapability of academic evaluation. Social stratification is transplanted to journal evaluation research. Journal stratification is the inheritor and makes improvements of core journal theory.

关 键 词：期刊分层 期刊评价 历史社会学 解析 

分 类 号：G231[文化科学]