检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]河南省传染病医院(郑州市第六人民医院),郑州450000 [2]河南省人民医院
出 处:《中国临床实用医学》2010年第7期6-8,共3页China Clinical Practical Medicine
摘 要:目的研究莫西沙星治疗社区获得性肺炎的临床疗效、安全性。方法216例轻中度社区获得性肺炎患者随机分为3组。A组(观察组)予莫西沙星序贯治疗,B组(对照组)予左氧氟沙星序贯治疗,C组(对照组)予头孢曲松钠/头孢泊肟酯联合阿奇霉素常规序贯治疗。结果①A组、B组和C组痊愈率分别为70.3%(52/74)、67.1%(47/70)和47.2%(34/72),临床有效率分别为86.5%(64/74)、82.9%(58/70)和72.2%(52/72),细菌清除率分别84.8%(28/33)、82.1%(23/28)和58.1%(18/31),3个指标中,A、B两组间差异均无统计学意义,A、C两组间差异均有统计学意义;②A组、B组和C组静脉注射时间分别为(2.27±1.14)d、(2.33±1.15)d和(3.03±1.08)d,A、B两组间差异无统计学意义,A、C两组间差异有统计学意义;③A组、B组和C组不良反应发生率分别为5.4%(4/74)、5.7%(4/70)和13.9%(10/72),A、B两组间差异无统计学意义,A、C两组间差异有统计学意义。结论莫西沙星序贯治疗社区获得性肺炎效果更为确切、安全。Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sequential moxifloxacin therapy in the treatment of patients with community acquired pneumonia. Methods One hundred and sixteen patients with community acquired pneumonia were randomly divided into three groups. In group A (moxifloxaein sequential group), moxifloxaein was administered by intravenous infusion 400 rag/250 ml once daily until to appear "clinical standard" of intravenous infusion turned into oral administration, followed by oral administration at the same dose. The total treatment duration was also 7 - 12 days. In group B (control group), levofloxacin was administered by intravenous infusion 0. 2 g/250 ml twice daily until to appear "clinical standard" of intravenous infusion turned into oral administration, followed by oral administration 0. 1 g twice daily. The total treatment duration was also 7 -12 days. In group C( control group) ,ceftriaxone sodium was administered by intravenous infusion 2.0 g/250 ml once daily until to appear "clinical standard" of intravenous infusion turned into oral administration ,followed by oral administration Cefpodoxime 0. 1 g twice daily with Azithromycin 0. 5 g once daily. The total treatment duration was also 7 - 12 days. Results The overall cure rates and efficacy rates were 70. 3% and 86. 5% in group A,67. 1% and 82. 9%in group B,47.2% and 72. 2%in group C,respectively. The bacterial clearance rates were 84. 8% in group A, 82. 1% in group B ,58. 1% in group C, respectively. There was no significant difference( P 〉 0.05 )between group A and group B, and there was significant difference( P 〈 0.05 ) between group A and group C in the above results. The time of appearing "clinical standard" of intravenous infusion turned into oral administration were(2. 27± 1.14)d in group A, (2. 33 ± 1.15)d in group B, (3.03 ± 1.08 )d in group C, respectively. There was no significant difference (P 〉 0. 05 )between group A and group B, and there was significant difference �
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30