心包穿刺抽液与心包腔内置管引流的比较  

Comparative analysis about the safety and efficacy of pericardiocentesis or laying vena duct drainage in treating pericardial effusion

作　　者：高友俊 

机构地区：[1]重庆市丰都县人民医院,408200

出　　处：《重庆医学》2010年第14期1873-1874,共2页Chongqing medicine

摘　　要：目的通过比较心包穿刺抽液与心包腔内置管引流两种方法,评价其安全性与有效性。方法将78例心包积液患者分为心包腔内置管引流组(n=41)和传统心包穿刺抽液组(n=37),比较两组并发症的发生率和心包积液引流量。结果心包腔内置管引流对心包堵塞有防止作用,且心包积液引流量远大于心包穿刺抽液组(P<0.05)。结论心包腔内置管引流比心包穿刺抽液更安全有效。Objective To compare analysis about evaluation of the safety and efficacy between pericardiocentesis or laying vena duct drainage in treating pericardial effusion.Methods 78 patients with pericardial effusion were divided into two groups：vena duct drainage group（n=41） and pericardiocentesis group（n=37）,analyzing their complication and the volume of the drainage fluid.Results There was no difference between vena duct drainage and pericardiocentesis in the complications.However,vena duct drainage could prevent the pericardial tamponade by pericardiocentesis and had the larger volume of the drainage fluid（P0.05）.Conclusion Vena duct drainage is better than pericardiocentes is in safety and efficacy.

关 键 词：心包穿刺 安全性 有效性 

分 类 号：R542.12[医药卫生—心血管疾病]