骨科开放损伤病灶两种吸引方式的比较  被引量:4

Treatment of open trauma in orthopedics by intermittent vacuum sealing drainage

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:蒋均远[1] 方礼明[1] 黄楠[1] 武永刚[1] 

机构地区:[1]武警北京总队第二医院,100037

出  处:《武警医学》2010年第7期595-596,600,共3页Medical Journal of the Chinese People's Armed Police Force

摘  要:目的通过对间歇负压吸引和常规持续负压吸引疗效的比较,探索更好的治疗骨科开放损伤的方法。方法 58例开放损伤患者随机分为间歇负压吸引组和常规持续负压吸引组。比较两组吸引成功时间和日平均吸引量。结果两组吸引成功时间和日平均吸引量比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论间歇负压吸引技术疗效好于常规持续负压吸引,是一种更好的治疗骨科开放损伤的方法。Objective To seek an effective method of treating open trauma by comparing the intermittent and continuous vacuum sealing drainage. Methods From January 2008 to June 2008, 58 patients were treated in the Department of Orthopedics in this hospital. They were divided into two groups: intermittent vacuum sealing drainage group and continuous vacuum sealing drainage group. Results The intermittent vacuum sealing drainage was much more effective than the continuous vacuum sealing drainage. Conclusions The intermittent vacuum sealing drainage is a good therapy for open trauma.

关 键 词:间歇负压 开放损伤 

分 类 号:R683.4[医药卫生—骨科学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象