检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蒋均远[1] 方礼明[1] 黄楠[1] 武永刚[1]
机构地区:[1]武警北京总队第二医院,100037
出 处:《武警医学》2010年第7期595-596,600,共3页Medical Journal of the Chinese People's Armed Police Force
摘 要:目的通过对间歇负压吸引和常规持续负压吸引疗效的比较,探索更好的治疗骨科开放损伤的方法。方法 58例开放损伤患者随机分为间歇负压吸引组和常规持续负压吸引组。比较两组吸引成功时间和日平均吸引量。结果两组吸引成功时间和日平均吸引量比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论间歇负压吸引技术疗效好于常规持续负压吸引,是一种更好的治疗骨科开放损伤的方法。Objective To seek an effective method of treating open trauma by comparing the intermittent and continuous vacuum sealing drainage. Methods From January 2008 to June 2008, 58 patients were treated in the Department of Orthopedics in this hospital. They were divided into two groups: intermittent vacuum sealing drainage group and continuous vacuum sealing drainage group. Results The intermittent vacuum sealing drainage was much more effective than the continuous vacuum sealing drainage. Conclusions The intermittent vacuum sealing drainage is a good therapy for open trauma.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229