检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王顺宾[1] 吴伯瑜[1] 楼非鸿[1] 杨际慧[1] 陈昭宏[1] 李海晖[1] 陈舜[1] 林建昌[1]
机构地区:[1]福建医科大学附属协和医院烧伤科,福州350001
出 处:《福建医科大学学报》2010年第3期213-215,共3页Journal of Fujian Medical University
摘 要:目的观察Meek微型皮肤移植技术在烧伤外科治疗大面积烧伤深度创面的疗效,探讨其临床使用价值及应用前景。方法选择住院治疗的12例大面积深度烧伤患者为研究对象,采用同体对照方法,烧伤创面切削痂后,分别应用Meek植皮技术及传统邮票状皮肤移植技术,在植皮面积与手术人员大致相同的情况下,对两种方法的操作时间、供皮用量、皮片成活率及创面愈合时间等指标进行比较分析。结果 Meek微型皮肤移植技术与传统邮票状皮肤移植技术比较,前者明显节省手术时间及供皮用量(P<0.05),创面愈合时间明显缩短(P<0.05),但皮片成活率无显著性差异(P>0.05)。术后随访3~8月,瘢痕增生程度亦无明显差别。结论对于大面积深度烧伤,可采用Meek微型皮肤移植技术取代传统邮票状皮肤移植技术。该技术相对于传统邮票状皮肤移植技术,具有缩短手术时间,节省人力,节省皮源及缩短创面愈合时间等优点,值得临床推广。Objective To investigate the clinical application of Meek skin grafting technique to large area deep burn.Methods Meek skin grafting technique and traditional stamp skin grafting were respectively employed to treat 12 patients with TBSA≥50%.Operating time,amount of donor skin,graft survival,and wound healing time were evaluated and compared between the two techniques.Results Compared with traditional stamp skin grafting,Meek skin grafting technique significantly shortened the operating and wound healing time(P0.05),and remarkably reduced the amount of donor skin(P0.05).There was no significant difference in the graft survival rate and scar formation during the 3-to-8-month follow-up.Conclusion Compared with traditional stamp skin grafting,Meek skin grafting technique uses less donor skin,shorter operating and wound healing time.It is an effective procedure for treating severely burned patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31