Co-transplantation of Schwann cells and bone marrow stromal cells versus single cell transplantation on repairing hemisected spinal cord injury of rats  

作　　者：Jifei Zhang Geng Wu Fusheng Zhao Xiudong Jin 

机构地区：[1]Department of Histology and Embryology, Mudanjiang Medical College, Mudanjiang 157011, Heilongjiang Province, China [2]Clinical Skills Training Center, Mudanjiang Medical College, Mudanjiang 157011, Heilongjiang Province, China [3]Deoartment of Phvsiology. Mudanjiang Medical Collecle. Mudaniiancl 157011, Heilongjiancl Province, China

出　　处：《Neural Regeneration Research》2010年第11期805-813,共9页中国神经再生研究（英文版）

基　　金：the National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. C010602;the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province, No. D200559;the Scientific Research Program of Educa-tion Department of Heilong-jiang Province, No. 11511428

摘　　要：BACKGROUND： Bone marrow stromal cells （BMSCs） or Schwann cells （SCs） transplantation alone can treat spinal cord injury. However, the transplantation either cell-type alone has disadvantages. The co-transplantation of both cells may benefit structural reconstruction and functional recovery of spinal nerves. OBJECTIVE： To verify spinal cord repair and related mechanisms after co-transplantation of BMSCs and SCs in a rat model of hemisected spinal cord injury. DESIGN, TIME AND SETTING： A randomized, controlled, animal experiment was performed at the Department of Histology and Embryology, Mudanjiang Medical College from January 2008 to May 2009. MATERIALS： Rabbit anti-S-100, glial fibrillary acidic protein, neuron specific enolase and neurofilament-200 monoclonal antibodies were purchased from Sigma, USA. METHODS： A total of 100 Wistar rats were used in a model of hemisected spinal cord injury. The rats were randomly assigned to vehicle control, SCs transplantation, BMSCs transplantation, and co-transplantation groups; 25 rats per group. At 1 week after modeling, SCs or BMSCs cultured in vitro were labeled and injected separately into the hemisected spinal segment of SCs and BMSCs transplantation groups through three injection points [5 μL （1 x 107 cells/mL）] cell suspension in each point）. In addition, a 15 μL 1 × 10^7 cells/mL SCs suspension and a 15 μL 1 × 10^7 cells/mL BMSC suspension were injected into co-transplantation group by the above method. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES： The Basso-Beattie-Bresnahan （BBB） locomotor rating scale and somatosensory evoked potential （SEP） tests were used to assess the functional recovery of rat hind limbs following operation. Structural repair of injured nerve tissue was observed by light microscopy, electron microscopy, immunohistochemistry, and magnetic resonance imaging （MRI）. In vivo differentiation, survival and migration of BMSCs were evaluated by immunofluorescence. RESULTS： BBB scores were significantly greater in all three transpBACKGROUND： Bone marrow stromal cells （BMSCs） or Schwann cells （SCs） transplantation alone can treat spinal cord injury. However, the transplantation either cell-type alone has disadvantages. The co-transplantation of both cells may benefit structural reconstruction and functional recovery of spinal nerves. OBJECTIVE： To verify spinal cord repair and related mechanisms after co-transplantation of BMSCs and SCs in a rat model of hemisected spinal cord injury. DESIGN, TIME AND SETTING： A randomized, controlled, animal experiment was performed at the Department of Histology and Embryology, Mudanjiang Medical College from January 2008 to May 2009. MATERIALS： Rabbit anti-S-100, glial fibrillary acidic protein, neuron specific enolase and neurofilament-200 monoclonal antibodies were purchased from Sigma, USA. METHODS： A total of 100 Wistar rats were used in a model of hemisected spinal cord injury. The rats were randomly assigned to vehicle control, SCs transplantation, BMSCs transplantation, and co-transplantation groups; 25 rats per group. At 1 week after modeling, SCs or BMSCs cultured in vitro were labeled and injected separately into the hemisected spinal segment of SCs and BMSCs transplantation groups through three injection points [5 μL （1 x 107 cells/mL）] cell suspension in each point）. In addition, a 15 μL 1 × 10^7 cells/mL SCs suspension and a 15 μL 1 × 10^7 cells/mL BMSC suspension were injected into co-transplantation group by the above method. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES： The Basso-Beattie-Bresnahan （BBB） locomotor rating scale and somatosensory evoked potential （SEP） tests were used to assess the functional recovery of rat hind limbs following operation. Structural repair of injured nerve tissue was observed by light microscopy, electron microscopy, immunohistochemistry, and magnetic resonance imaging （MRI）. In vivo differentiation, survival and migration of BMSCs were evaluated by immunofluorescence. RESULTS： BBB scores were significantly greater in all three transp

关 键 词：bone marrow stromal cells Schwann cells CO-TRANSPLANTATION spinal cord injury neural regeneration 

分 类 号：Q813.1[生物学—生物工程] Q813