检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]重庆医科大学儿童医院神经内科,重庆400014
出 处:《中国当代儿科杂志》2010年第7期573-575,共3页Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics
摘 要:目的比较左乙拉西坦、丙戊酸钠、苯巴比妥对大鼠反复热性惊厥的预防作用的差异,指导临床选药。方法 60只Wistar大鼠,随机分为4组,分别每日灌服左乙拉西坦(200mg/kg)、丙戊酸钠(250mg/kg)、苯巴比妥(30mg/kg)及生理盐水(8mL/kg)。连续灌服5d后,用热水浴(45℃)诱导热性惊厥,观察其热性惊厥潜伏期、惊厥持续时间、惊厥严重程度改变情况。结果大鼠用药后,3个药物干预组惊厥潜伏期延长、惊厥持续时间缩短,惊厥严重程度也明显减轻,与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05或0.01),其中苯巴比妥组惊厥持续时间最短,惊厥严重程度最轻;左乙拉西坦组与丙戊酸钠组差异无统计学意义。结论左乙拉西坦与丙戊酸钠、苯巴比妥比较均能有效预防大鼠反复热性惊厥,其中苯巴比妥疗效较好,左乙拉西坦与丙戊酸钠疗效无差异。Objective To study and compare the prophylatic efficacy of levetiracetam,valproate and phenobarbital on febrile convulsions in rats.Methods Sixty Wistar rats were randomly administered with levetiracetam(200 mg /kg),valproate(250 mg /kg),phenobarbital(30 mg /kg) or normal saline(8 ml /kg) for 5 days.Five days later,febrile convulsions were induced by hyperthermal bath(45℃).The latency,duration and the severity of seizures were observed.Results In all the three drug-treated groups,the latency was significantly prolonged,and the duration and the severity of seizures were notably reduced compared with the saline group(P〈0.05 or 0.01).The phenobarbital group had the shortest duration of seizures and the least severe seizures among the three drug-treated groups.There were no significant differences between the levetiracetam and valproate groups.Conclusions Continuous administration of levetiracetam,valproate or phenobarbital is effective in preventing recurrent febrile convulsions in rats.Phenobarbital appears to be more effective than levetiracetam and valproate.There were no significant differences in the prophylactic efficacy between levetiracetam and valproate.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.149.79