检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马洪文[1] 魏俊[1,2] 高艳章[1] 庞阔[2] 隋博[1]
机构地区:[1]军事交通学院装备保障系 [2]中国人民解放军78511部队
出 处:《兵工自动化》2010年第7期32-34,39,共4页Ordnance Industry Automation
摘 要:针对装备维修保障系统效能指标的相对性、模糊性,运用模糊综合评判方法进行系统效能评估。根据完成装备维修保障任务所应具备的能力,建立装备维修保障系统效能评估指标体系,对单项指标采用专家评判法,采用递推算法给出目标层对评语的隶属度,按最大隶属度原则给出优劣等级评定,并由实例得出合理结果。该评估方法思路清晰、计算方便,为装备维修保障系统评估体系标准化提供了一种思路。Aiming at the illegibility and relativity of the equipment maintenance support system, chooses the fuzzy comprehensive method, Based on the ability of what the system should be possessed when completing the equipment maintenance support task, builds up the efficiency evaluating indicator system of equipment maintenance support, evaluates the monomial index by using the expert mark method, gets the subjection coefficient between the object and comment by using the step by step method, assesses the grade according to the maximal subjection coefficient principle and finally the rational result is gained from the example. The approach of this evaluation method is distinct and the calculation is very convenient. It can provide a new method for the evaluation system standardization of the equipment maintenance support system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.236.97