检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张伟[1] 申岩[1] 杨文增[1] 穆银静[1] 崔振宇[1]
机构地区:[1]河北大学附属医院泌尿外科,河北保定071000
出 处:《现代泌尿外科杂志》2010年第4期305-306,共2页Journal of Modern Urology
摘 要:目的对比研究人体组织粘合剂与传统缝合方法对包皮环切术切口的治疗效果。方法门诊包皮环切术488例随机分成A、B两组,A组258例切口应用人体组织粘合剂粘合,B组230例应用丝线或可吸收线间断缝合,观察并比较关闭切口时间、切口疼痛发生率、术后疼痛持续时间、术后水肿情况、切口愈合分级的情况。结果在关闭切口时间、切口疼痛发生率、术后疼痛持续时间方面A组与B组有显著差异性(P<0.05)。在术后水肿情况、切口愈合分级方面A组与B组无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论应用人体组织粘合剂行包皮环切术具有诸多优点,在包皮环切手术中值得广泛推广。Objective To study the different therapeutic effect of the body tissue adhesive and traditional suture in circumcision. Methods 488 cases of outpatient circumcision were randomly divided into two groups. Group A reveived epiglu,and group B traditional treatment. The difference of the time of closing incision,incision ache percentage,the duration of post-operative ache,the condition of foreskin hydropsia and operative incision healing were observed and compared. Results Group A and group B had significant difference in the time of closing incision,incision ache percentage, the duration of postoperative ache. Nevertheless, they had no significant difference in the condition of foreskin hydropsia and operative incision healing. Conclusions Circumcision with body tissue adhesive has many advantages over the traditional method and deserves general clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222