检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]苏州同济司法鉴定所,215007 [2]苏州市中级人民法院,215007
出 处:《中国司法鉴定》2010年第4期72-74,共3页Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences
摘 要:目的探讨骨折延迟愈合、骨折不连接伤残等级评定条款的适用。方法从患者的性别、年龄、骨折部位/种类、合并疾病情况、治疗方式、骨折愈合时间、伤残等级等资料分析66例骨折延迟愈合、骨折不连接的评残案件。结果进行伤残等级鉴定60例,其中八级2例,九级11例,十级28例,未构成伤残19例,还有6例未申请伤残鉴定。结论现行国家鉴定标准尚无骨折延迟愈合、骨折不连接的明确条款,故有一定的不适应性,在实践中可比照最相类似条款进行评残。Objective To explore the applicability of the evaluation standard of disability degree for coalesce and unjoined fractures.Method 66 disability cases of coalesce and unjoined fractures were analyzed based on data of the sex,age,fracture location,fracture type,complicating diseases,treatment method,healing period,disability grade and so on.Result Of 60 cases,2 were determined to grade 8(disability degree),11 to grade 9,28 to grade 10,19 to non-disability;and 6 cases didn't apply for evaluation.Conclusion There are no specific provisions in the present standards to determine the disability degree for coalesce and unjoined fractures.,but similar provisions can be used.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171