检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《吉林医学》2010年第21期3414-3415,共2页Jilin Medical Journal
摘 要:目的:探讨下腹部小切口及腹腔镜手术的可行性。方法:选择卵巢囊肿、异位妊娠、盆腔粘连及输卵管性囊肿、不孕症患者126例,自愿采用下腹部小切口术式和腹腔镜术式进行附件手术,并与腹腔镜附件手术进行对照。结果:下腹部小切口术式的多项临床指标与腹腔镜的指标相近,两组术后均无感染、恢复快。结论:下腹部小切口手术及腹腔镜手术都能达到微创效果,下腹部小切口手术比腹腔镜附件手术简单,费用低,更便于普及和推广。Objective To explore the feasibility of abdominoscope and abdoment small cut in appendicular operation.Methods 126 patients were selected if they got ovarian cysts,ectopic pregnancy and tubal infertility.The patients could choose the form of operation.Such as,abdominoscope and abdoment small cut.At last the two kinds of operation form were compared in some indexes.Results The test clinical indexes are similar between the two groups.Both of the two kinds of operation had no postoperative infection and recovery fast.Conclusion Both of abdominoscope and abdoment small cut operation can achieve minimally invasive effect.To compare with abdominoscope,abdoment small cut operation is much cheaper, lower cost and easier to popularize.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7