检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]黄河勘测规划设计有限公司,河南郑州450003
出 处:《华北水利水电学院学报》2009年第6期44-46,共3页North China Institute of Water Conservancy and Hydroelectric Power
摘 要:针对跨汉江建筑物距地面高、跨度大、过流量大的特点,比较分析了渡槽、桥式倒虹吸和隧洞式倒虹吸3种结构形式的特点:渡槽水头损失小,下部槽墩比较高;隧洞式倒虹吸水头损失比较大;桥式倒虹吸结合了两者的优点,既减少了水头损失,又降低了槽墩.通过对工程量与技术经济性进行比较,最终确定采用桥式倒虹吸的结构形式.Three kinds of spanning river structures,such as aqueduct,bridge-type inverted siphon,and tunnel-type inverted siphon,were analyzed and compared with to solve the difficulties of structures spanning Hanjiang River,as longer span,larger traversing flow,and higher height.The results show that,water head of aqueduct loses little,and lower part of aqueduct′s piers is high,tunnel-type inverted siphon was larger head loss,bridge-type inverted siphon integrates with the merits of above both,it has not only smaller water head loss but also lower bridge piers.Finally the structure of bridge-type inverted siphon was adopted based on technical and economic comparison results.
分 类 号:TV6[水利工程—水利水电工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38