检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘向东[1] 郑晓娜[1] 雷明[1] 陈丽华[1]
机构地区:[1]北京大学光华管理学院
出 处:《营销科学学报(辑刊)》2009年第2期72-95,共24页Journal of Marketing Science
摘 要:本文研究了当(1)需求既受价格,也受销售渠道营销投入的影响;(2)产品最终售价由制造商统一控制的情况下,制造商的渠道选择策略。研究发现,当制造商在直销渠道的运营效率比较高时,它偏好双渠道策略。在一定条件下,如零售商的营销效率较高,其支付的批发价格相对较低,或所得的需求比例较高时,零售商也可能偏好双渠道结构。但值得指出的是,制造商和零售商预先协商的批发价相对零售价的比例对二者利润的影响比较复杂,因而二者在批发价格比率上的谈判要谨慎。We investigate the manufacturer's channel choice when it faces end demand that not only dependents on price but on channel members' sales effort. In addition, the manufacturer controls the manufacturer suggested retail price (MSRP). We find that when the manufacturer's operating cost at the direct channel is low,he prefers the dual-channel strategy. Under certain conditions, e. g. , when the retailer's marketing efficiency is high, the whole price is relatively low,or the demand proportion that goes to the retail channel is relatively large, the retailer benefits from the dual- channel structure as well. However, we find that the wholesale price to retail price ratio, which is pre-set through negotiation,may have complex (non-monotone) impacts on the manufacturer and retailer's profits. Therefore, we suggest that the two firms take caution when negotiating on the wholesale-retail price ratio.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.195