检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东省茂名市人民医院,525000
出 处:《齐齐哈尔医学院学报》2010年第12期1969-1970,共2页Journal of Qiqihar Medical University
摘 要:目的观察两种口腔护理方法对经口气管插管患者的护理效果,以便更好为经口气管插管患者提供护理。方法将98例ICU经口气管插管患者随机分为对照组和观察组,对照组按常规口腔护理法进行口腔护理;观察组按冲洗法进行口腔护理,对两组的护理效果进行比较。结果对照组口臭发生率为30.6%,口腔炎症发生率为20.4%;观察组口臭发生率为10.2%,口腔炎症发生率为6.1%。两种口腔护理方法结果差异有统计学意义。结论 在ICU经口气管插管患者中,运用冲洗法行口腔护理,能促进患者舒适,预防患者的口臭和口腔炎症。Objective To observe the effects of two oral cavity nursing methods for the patients who had been carried out the tracheal intubation by oral cavity(TIBOC),and found out the better oral cavity nursing method for the TIBOC patients.Methods A total of 98 cases TIBOC patients in ICU were at random divided into control group and observation group.The patients in the control group were performed the regular oral cavity nursing care,while the washing method was carried out in the observation group and the effects in two groups were compared.Results The incidences of halitosis and stomatitis in the control group were,respectively,30.6% and 20.4%.The incidences of halitosis and stomatitis in the observation group were,respectively,10.2% and 6.1%.The differences between two oral cavity nursing methods had statistical significance.Conclusions The washing nursing method used for the TIBOC patients in ICU can make the patients comfortable and prevent the patients from halitosis and stomatitis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28