《中国文献编目规则》与《资源描述和检索》编修机制比较研究  

Comparative Research of the Revision Mechanism of Chinese Bibliographical Cataloguing Rules and Resource Description and Access

作　　者：吴雷[1] 

机构地区：[1]济南大学图书馆,山东济南250022

出　　处：《图书馆建设》2010年第7期69-73,共5页Library Development

摘　　要：通过《中国文献编目规则》与《资源描述和检索》编修机制的比较可知,二者在组织机构、人员组成、资金支持、产品用户、运作程序及指导原则等方面存在较大差异。相比之下,《中国文献编目规则》存在组织松散、人员流动性大、缺少可靠的资金来源、忽视用户的参与、运作程序不规范、指导原则可操作性差等问题。《资源描述和检索》经过多年的发展与修订,已较为成熟,其成功的实践经验与完善的编修机制能够为我国编目规则修订工作提供一些借鉴。Chinese Bibliographical Cataloguing Rules and Resource Description and Access（RDA） are different in the revision mechanism,and has differences in organization,staff composition,funding,users,operating procedures and guidelines.Compared with RDA,Chinese Bibliographical Cataloguing Rules has problems in loose organization,flowing staff,lack of reliable funding and user involvement,poor operability of guiding principles.Through the development and repeated revision,RDA has already been mature,its successful experience and perfect revision mechanism could provide reference for the revision of cataloguing rules in China.

关 键 词：《中国文献编目规则》 《资源描述和检索》 编修机制 

分 类 号：G254[文化科学—图书馆学]