检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:白雪丽[1] 沈亚娟[1] 柳欣琦[1] 张炳昌[1]
机构地区:[1]山东大学附属省立医院检验科,山东省济南市250021
出 处:《中华全科医学》2010年第9期1179-1180,共2页Chinese Journal of General Practice
摘 要:目的评价UF-100、UF-1000i全自动尿沉渣分析仪在尿红细胞检测中的性能。方法分别将UF-1000i和UF-100两种全自动尿沉渣分析仪尿红细胞检测结果与美国DiaSys(R/S2003)工作站(简称DiaSys)镜检红细胞的结果进行分析比较。结果 DiaSys、UF-1000i及UF-100三者间的相关系数分别为:r=0.732(DiaSys与UF-1000i)、r=0.693(DiaSys与UF-100)、及r=0.827(UF-1000i与UF-100)。以DiaSys检测系统为临床评价标准,UF-1000i检测红细胞的假阳性率为8.1%,假阴性率为5.2%,敏感性为94.8%,特异性为91.9%,符合率为92.5%;UF-100检测红细胞结果的假阳性率为10.5%,阴性率为6.3%,敏感性为93.7%,特异性为89.5%,符合率为90.3%。结论 UF-1000i全自动尿沉渣分析仪检测尿液红细胞的性能优于UF-100。Objective To evaluate the performance of UF-100 and UF-1000i urine sedimentary systems in detecting red blood cell.Methods The DiaSys workstation of US was used as a clinical standard in the comparison of the UF-1000i and the UF-100 urine sedimentary system to detect red blood cell in clinical samples.Results Good agreement for red blood cell was obtained between UF-1000i(r=0.732)and UF-100(r=0.693)and DiaSys workstation and both flow cytometers(r=0.827).Compared with the clinical standard of DiaSys workstation,the false positive rate of the UF-1000i was 8.1%,the false negative rate was 5.2%,the sensitivity was 94.8%,the specificity was 91.9%,and the precision rate was 92.5%.The false positive rate of the UF-100 was 10.5%,the false negative rate was 6.3%,the sensitivity was 93.7%,the specificity was 89.5%,and the precision rate was 90.3%.Conclusion The performance of the UF-1000i is better than that of the UF-100 in detectiong red blood cell.
关 键 词:UF-1000i尿沉渣分析仪 UF-100尿沉渣分析仪 DIASYS 红细胞
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30