检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东惠州中心医院,516001
出 处:《内蒙古中医药》2010年第12期28-29,共2页Inner Mongolia Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的:探讨非特异性免疫药物结合中药治疗激素抵抗性哮喘(SRA)的临床疗效.方法:60例SRA患者,分成非特异性+中药治疗组(A组)30例和非特异性治疗组(B组)30例,两组均连续治疗10天为1个疗程,共3个疗程.结果:A组总有效率90.0%明显高于B组73.3%(X〈/2〉=3.798,P〈0.05);2组治疗后大部分症状积分较治疗前显著降低,A组症状总积分改善均优于B组(P〈0.05或P〈0.01);A组用力第1秒肺活量(FEVl)、最大通气量(MVV)、最大呼气流速(PEF)、用力呼气中期流量(MMEF)较治疗前有明显改善(P〈0.05或P〈0.01).结论:非特异性免疫药物结合中医治疗SRA.能提高肺脏通气功能、改善气道高反应、减轻气道慢性非特异性炎症、减轻小气道阻塞有明显疗效.Objectlve To study the Curative effect of of steroid resistant asthma (SRA) by non-specific immune drugs with TCM. Methods 60 cases with SRA were divided into non-specific+medicine treatment group (A group)30 cases and non-specific treatment group (13 group) 30 pcases, two groups were treated continuously for 10 days as a course of treatment, a total of 3 courses.Results A total effective rate in group A 90.0% were higher than 73.3% in group B(Х^2=3.798,P〈0.05);The scores of most symptom after treatment compared with before treatment were significantly lower,The score of total symptoms in group A were better than group B(P all〈0.05 or P〈0.0I);Tbe index of Force the vital volume in 1 sec(FEV1),Maximum voluntary ventilation(MVV),Peak expiratory flow(PEF),Foreed mid-expiratory flow(MMEF) in group A after treatment compared with before treatment had significantly improved (all P〈0.05 or P〈0.01).Conclusion The non-specific immune drugs combina- tion with TCM can increase the lung ventilation function, improve airway hyperresponsiveness,chronic airway to reduce non-specific inflamma- tion, relieve small airway obstruction had significant Curative effect in patients with SRA
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200