意义、指称与实在——后期库恩对不可通约性问题的语言学辩护  

Meaning,Reference and Reality——The Linguistic Defence of the Incommensurability Theory by Late Kuhn

作　　者：何兵[1] 殷维[1] 

机构地区：[1]重庆大学贸易与行政学院,重庆400044

出　　处：《科学技术哲学研究》2010年第4期55-59,共5页Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology

基　　金：国家社会科学基金(07XZX002)

摘　　要：在库恩看来,无论采用指称的稳定性还是指称的连续性策略均不能回避不可通约性问题。除了实指行为外,隐喻、模型在确定语言与世界(术语与其指称)的关联上发挥着重要的作用。基于分类词典所建构的多世界理论,库恩在维护不可通约性的同时,避开了对实在本身的讨论。According to Kuhn,we can＇t avoid the problem of incommensurability,whether we take the strategy of referential stability or referential continuity.Metaphor and model are important for determining the connection between language and the world.Based on the plurality of worlds propounded by the lexical theory Kuhn vindicated his famous theory and avoided discussion on reality itself.

关 键 词：指称的稳定性 指称的连续性 实指 分类词典 多世界理论 

分 类 号：B15[哲学宗教—世界哲学]