检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江瑞安市人民医院药剂科,瑞安市325200 [2]浙江瑞安市人民医院产科,瑞安市325200 [3]温州医学院,温州市325035
出 处:《中国药房》2010年第30期2800-2802,共3页China Pharmacy
摘 要:目的:探讨不同肠道清洁方案用于电子结肠镜检查的经济学效果。方法:172例肠道需要进行清洁的患者随机分为3组,分别服用导泻剂(A组)、复方聚乙二醇电解质散(B组)、磷酸钠盐口服溶液(C组),观察疗效并进行成本-效果分析。结果:A、B、C组肠道清洁有效率分别为83.61%、86.21%、94.34%,成本分别为268.0、337.6、440.8元,成本-效果比分别为320.54、391.60、467.25;B、C方案相对于A方案的增量成本-效果比分别为2676.92、1610.44。结论:C方案肠道清洁效果最佳。OBJECTIVE:To discuss the economic effects of different intestinal cleaning therapies in electronic colonoscopy.METHODS:172 patients were randomly assigned into three groups:Group A(Catharsis agent),Group B(Compound Polyethylene Glycol-Electrolyte Powder),Group C(Sodium Phosphates Oral Solution).The observation of curative effect and analysis of cost-effectiveness were conducted.RESULTS:The effective rates of the three groups were 83.61%、 86.21% and 94.34% with cost of 268.0 yuan,337.6 yuan,440.8 yuan,respectively.The cost-effectiveness ratios of the three groups were 320.54,391.60 and 467.25,respectively.The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of Group B to Group A was 2 676.92 and that of Group C to Group A was 1 610.44.CONCLUSION:Regime C is the most effective for intestinal cleaning among three groups.
关 键 词:肠道清洁 导泻剂 复方聚乙二醇电解质散 磷酸钠盐口服溶液 成本-效果分析
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145