May Fourth Literary Tradition and the Transformation of Chinese Literature in the 1930s  

五四文学传统与三十年代文学转型(英文)

作　　者：朱晓进 

机构地区：[1]School of Chinese Language and Culture, Nanjing Normal University

出　　处：《Social Sciences in China》2010年第3期69-83,共15页中国社会科学（英文版）

摘　　要：The May Fourth movement that ushered in China’s modern literature constitutes a central and inexhaustible tradition and topic. This paper proceeds from the Chinese literary community’s reflections on the May Fourth literary tradition to explore the different aims, methods and perspectives of the May Fourth and 1930s literature through the interpretations and evaluations of each period. May Fourth literature followed a humanist approach while that of the 1930s took a social sciences approach. This point can provide us with a correct and rational explanation of the different interpretations and evaluations of the two periods and their complex entanglement. Furthermore, by examining the differences in approach of the two periods, we can look back over the May Fourth literary tradition and gain a better grasp of the transformation of literature in the 1930s, and thus sum up the experience and lessons of the literary tradition of both periods."五四"作为中国现代文学的开端,是绕不开和说不尽的一个传统和话题。文章选择从20世纪30年代文学界对五四文学传统的反思入手,通过对五四文学与30年代文学的阐释和评价,探究其背后所隐含的不同言说目的、方式和观照视角,由此来透视言说者和评价者基于不同历史阶段所持的不同的文学思路。五四文学秉持的是一种人文学科的思路,而30年代文学信守的则是一种社会科学的思路,而对于两个时代的不同阐释和评价以及其间的种种复杂纠葛,在此都可找到准确、合理的解释。另外,通过30年代与"五四"所持文学思路的差异,还可以反观五四文学传统以及把握30年代文学的转型,总结五四文学传统和30年代文学传统的经验和教训。

关 键 词：tradition of the May Fourth literature literature in the 1930s transformation of literature humanist approach social sciences approach 

分 类 号：I206.6[文学—中国文学]