玻恩与玻姆关于因果性、决定论思想观点异同之比较  

A Comparison Between the Nontions of Born and Bohm on Causality and Determinism

作　　者：桂起权[1] 姜小慧[2] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学哲学学院,湖北武汉430072 [2]华中科技大学哲学系,湖北武汉430074

出　　处：《河池学院学报》2010年第3期1-6,共6页Journal of Hechi University

摘　　要：1.M.玻恩的因果观:量子世界是因果与机遇联合支配的;量子粒子具有内禀不确定性,机遇律是终极自然律;几率、机遇的概念比因果更为基本。2.D.玻姆的量子势因果观:自然界根本不存在终级自然律,而且每一层次都突现独特的规律。因果性只是相对的必然性。偶然性总是出现在多种不同因素、可能趋势的交叉点上。量子势因果解释是因果决定性与概率统计性的某种整合。它在物理上有清晰的直观模型;在哲学上有明确的本体论基础。M. Born＇ s notions on causality are that Quantum World is governed by causality and chance jointly; that quantum particle has the intrinsic property of uncertainty, and the law of chance is the last law of nature;and that the concepts of probability and chance are more elementary than causality. While D. Bohm＇ s notions of potential causality are that there is no last law of nuture at all, and each level manifests unique roles; that causality is just relative necessity and contingency always appears on the cross point of many different factors or probable tendencies;that the potential causality interpretation is some kind of integration of causal determination and probability statistics, which has clear intuitive model in physics, and has definite ontological base in philosophy.

关 键 词：玻恩 几率非完全决定论 玻姆量子势因果解释 绝对机遇 

分 类 号：B80[哲学宗教—思维科学]