检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:方文[1]
出 处:《湖北农业科学》2010年第8期2006-2009,共4页Hubei Agricultural Sciences
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(09JBY060)
摘 要:理论界把现有农村集体土地流转中出现的种种矛盾和问题的首要原因归结为土地产权制度的缺陷,因此对农村集体土地产权制度的变革也有了多种思路和争论。基于我国社会制度框架和国家制度供给的可能性,维持现有农村土地集体所有制成为不能突破的制度底线。但是这一制度选择固然有外在的约束性条件限制,却更多地有着其适应我国具体国情和"三农"发展水平需要的内在合理性。因此,完善土地流转的对策选择重点应该是加强土地流转的相关法制和操作规范的建设。The theory circle attributed the primary reasons about various contradictions and problems in the existing rural land circulation to the shortcomings of land property rights system.Therefore, the system of rural collective land property rights had various ideas and arguments.Based on China's social system framework and the possibility of a national system supply, to maintain the existing collective ownership of rural land system became the bottom line which could not be broken through.This system choice did have external binding conditions, but also had the intrinsic rationality which adapted to the specific national conditions of our country and the needs of countryside, farmers and agriculture development level.Therefore, the focus of countermeasures for improving land transfer should be on strengthening the rule of law related to land transfer and construction practices.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40