发达国家马克思主义经济学派劳资关系研究的方法论比较  

Methodological Reflections upon the Studies on the Labor - capital Relations of the Marxist Economics Schools in the Developed Countries

作　　者：孙寿涛[1] 

机构地区：[1]南开大学马克思主义教育学院,天津300071

出　　处：《延安大学学报（社会科学版）》2010年第4期45-49,共5页Journal of Yan'an University (Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究项目(09YJA710042)资助

摘　　要：劳资关系作为矛盾统一体,内含着劳动与资本两个对立面。法国调节学派和美国社会积累结构学派从资本一极出发,视劳动一极为被动的适应资本要求的客体;而意大利的"自主论马克思主义"则强调劳动一极,力主劳动相对于资本而言的自主性而非依赖性。在劳资关系的研究中,应综合这两种方法论倾向,将劳动与资本结合起来予以辩证考察。Labor - capital relations, as a contradiction unity, consist of the two opposites i.e. labor and capital. The Marxist study on the labor -capital relations after the 2nd World War provides us two ways： The Regulation School of France and the SSA School of U. S. studied from the capital opposite and treated the other opposite - la- boras the passive object which must suit the needs of capital; but the ＂autonomist Marxism＂ of Italy stressed the labor opposite and emphasized the labor＇s autonomy from the capital, not the dependency on the capital. We think that we should synthesize the two methodological ways and study the unity and the two opposites of labor and capital dialectically.

关 键 词：劳资关系 调节学派 社会积累结构学派 自主论马克思主义 

分 类 号：F0-0[经济管理—政治经济学]