检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄峰
出 处:《现代医药卫生》2010年第18期2745-2747,共3页Journal of Modern Medicine & Health
摘 要:目的:比较齐拉西酮和舒必利治疗以阴性症状为主的老年期精神分裂症的疗效和安全性。方法:将76例以阴性症状为主的老年期精神分裂症患者随机分为齐拉西酮组(38例)和舒必利组(38例),分别给予齐拉西酮和舒必利治疗,疗程8周。采用阳性与阴性症状量表(PANSS)和阴性症状评定量表(SANS)评定疗效,不良反应量表(TESS)评定不良反应。结果:治疗8周后,齐拉西酮组总有效率为81.58%,舒必利组总有效率为78.95%,两组疗效差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。齐拉西酮与舒必利对阴性症状均有较好疗效,齐拉西酮组不良反应的程度较舒必利组轻。结论:齐拉西酮治疗以阴性症状为主的老年期精神分裂症疗效确切,不良反应轻。Objective:To compare the curative ffect and safety of ziprasidone and sulpiride treatment of elderly schizophrenia with predominantly negative symptoms.Methods:The 76 senile patients with predominantly negative symptoms of schizophrenia were randomly divided into ziprasidone group (38 cases) and sulpiride group (38 cases),and treated with ziprasidone and sulpiride respectively for 8 weeks.Using Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and negative symptom rating scale (SANS) to assess the efficacy,side effects scale (TESS) was used to assess the adverse reactions.Results:After 8 weeks of treatment,ziprasidone total effective rate was 81.58%, sulpiride total effective rate was 78.95%,without significant difference between two groups.Ziprasidone and sulpiride on negative symptoms had good effect.In ziprasidone group,the extent of adverse reactions was lighter than that in sulpiride group.Conclusion:Ziprasidone in treatment of predominantly negative symptoms of senile schizophrenia has definite eflect with less adverse reaction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.133.141.175