检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李满奎[1]
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学经济法学院
出 处:《环球法律评论》2010年第4期22-35,共14页Global Law Review
摘 要:"诉讼禁止条款"与工伤保险体系的"强制性"相互依存、不可偏废。"诉讼禁止条款"成为强制性工伤保险的核心要素之一,对于保护雇主和劳动者的利益至关重要,这也是实行工伤社会保险国家的通例。我国工伤保险体系中的"诉讼禁止条款"有着重大缺陷,消解了工伤保险体系的"强制性",极大地损害了劳动者的利益。应当从根源上反思我国工伤保险体系的"强制性"特征,并相应地对"诉讼禁止条款"进行重新构建,以此来完善我国的工伤保险体系。The "bar on action" clause is closely related to the compulsory nature of occupational injury insurance system. Being one of the core elements of the compulsory occupational injury insurance system, the "bar on action" clause is vital to the protection of interests of both employees and employers and becomes a rule for a country practicing occupational injury insur- ance. Current version of "bar on action" clause in occupational injury insurance system in China has very serious defects which adversely affect the compulsory nature of occupational injury insur- ance system and jeopardize the interests of injured workers. This article calls for reflecting upon the compulsory nature of occupational injury insurance system, and reshaping correspondingly the "bar on action" clause so as to improve the occupational injury insurance system in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145