检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]湖北谷城县人民医院肿瘤内科,襄樊441700
出 处:《医药导报》2010年第8期1024-1026,共3页Herald of Medicine
摘 要:目的比较OLF与ELF两种化疗方案治疗老年人晚期胃癌的疗效和毒性不良反应。方法 48例均经病理组织学检查证实为胃癌的患者,随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组24例,21d为1个周期,每例至少完成2周期。治疗组给予OLF方案;对照组给予ELF方案。结果治疗组完全缓解(CR)2例,部分缓解(PR)10例,稳定(NC)5例,进展(PD)7例;对照组中CR1例,PR9例,NC6例,PD8例,两组疗效差异无显著性(P>0.05),主要毒性不良反应为骨髓抑制、胃肠道反应及可逆性的手足综合征。结论 OLF方案与ELF方案治疗老年人晚期胃癌的近期疗效相近,毒性不良反应可以耐受,是治疗老年人晚期胃癌的较好方案之一。Objective To compare the efficacy and toxicity of different chemotherapies of OLF and ELF for elderly advanced gastric cancer. Methods 48 patients,diagnozed as gastric cancer via histopathological examination,were randomly divided into two groups,treatment group and control group,with 24 cases in each group,treated for at least two cycles,21 days per cycle. Results In the treatment group,CR 2,PR 10,NC 5 and PD 7. In the control group,CR 1,PR 9,NC 6 and PD 8,no significant difference was found between two groups( P 0. 05) . The main toxicities were myelosuppression,gastrointestinal reactions and reversible hand-foot skin reaction. Conclusion The short-term chemotherapeutic efficacy of OLF is satisfied for elderly advanced gastric cancer and the toxicity can be tolerated. It is an effective treatment for the elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117