检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陆志豪[1] 王野平[1] 仇旭光[1] 王倩[1] 占卫兵[1]
出 处:《中华中医药学刊》2010年第8期1789-1790,共2页Chinese Archives of Traditional Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的:探讨中西医结合治疗烧伤患者的临床疗效。方法:把Ⅱ°以上烧伤患者分成中西医结合治疗组和由纯西医治疗的对照组,二组在经过30天的治疗后,以伤口渗液少、无疼痛感、创面边缘结痂或痂下无浓性分泌物,健康肉芽组织生长为疗效标准,对二组进行对照判断。结果,治疗组有效率为92%,对照组为64%,治疗组的疗效明显高于对照组。讨论:中西医结合治疗烧伤有其患者痛苦少、费用低、疗效明显的长处,但对其规律尚待进一步研究和发掘。Objective:Integrated Treatment of burn patients with cancer. Methods:Ⅱ ° above the burn patients were divided into treatment group and Integrative Medicine treated by a pure control group,the two groups after 30 days of treatment,wound exudate less and no pain,wound scab or crust under the edge No concentration of secretions,granulation tissue growth for the efficacy of health standards,to judge the two groups were compared. A result,the effective rate was 92% in treatment group and control group 64%,the efficacy of the treatment group was significantly higher. Discussion:Combination treatment of burns have less pain,low cost,efficacy obvious strengths,but its law pending further study and explore.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249