检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑以州[1] 储榆林[1] 邵宗鸿[1] 张益枝[1] 陈桂彬[1]
机构地区:[1]中国医学科学院,中国协和医科大学血液学研究所,血液病医院
出 处:《中华血液学杂志》1999年第4期175-177,共3页Chinese Journal of Hematology
摘 要:目的探讨进一步提高重型再生障碍性贫血(SAA)疗效的方法。方法采用前瞻性同期对照研究方法,比较抗淋巴细胞球蛋白(ALG)单用(NIST方案)或联合环孢霉素A(CsA)(IST方案)治疗SAA的疗效。结果IST方案组不仅疗效(837%)显著高于NIST方案组(576%),且可降低早期死亡率、缩短脱离红细胞输注时间,治疗有效者骨髓BFUE和CFUGM数量恢复更为良好。结论ALG联合CsA治疗SAA疗效明显优于单用ALG,且治疗有效者骨髓造血功能恢复更为完全。Objective To explore more effective regimen for severe aplastic anemia (SAA). Methods A prospective, randomized clinical trial was conducted to determine whether the outcome of SAA patients treated with the combination of antilymphocyte globulin(ALG) and cyclosporine A(CsA) (intensive immunosuppressive therapy, IIST) was better than that with ALG alone (non intensive immunosuppressive therapy, NIIST). Results The response rate of IIST group(83 7%) was significantly higher than that of NIIST group(57 6%),with a lower risk of early mortality and a shorter time to red cell transfusion independence.Furthermore,the recovery of bone marrow BFU E and CFU GM of the responding patients was more complete in IIST group than in NIIST group.Conclusions The treatment outcome was better with IIST than with NIIST for SAA.
分 类 号:R556.505[医药卫生—血液循环系统疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117