制霉菌素与凯妮汀治疗妊娠期念珠菌性阴道炎效果的对比分析  

Analysis and compare clinical efficacy of treating vaginal candidiasis with vaginal and candidiasis respectively

作　　者：李林[1] 

机构地区：[1]潍坊医学院附属齐鲁石化中心医院产科,255400

出　　处：《中国实用医药》2010年第24期48-50,共3页China Practical Medicine

摘　　要：目的对比制霉菌素与凯妮汀治疗妊娠期念珠菌性阴道炎疗效,评价药物效果。方法通过对我院门诊2004年3月至2008年10月妊娠期念珠菌性道炎的277例患者进行分组治疗,A组患者行制霉菌素治疗,B组行凯妮汀治疗,观察症状改善情况及体征和镜下复查结果,记录并对比分析病情变化和结果。结果凯妮汀治愈84例,占60.87%,制霉菌素治愈70例,占50.36%,统计分析示χ2=10.380,P<0.05,差异具有统计学意义。结论凯妮汀治疗妊娠期念珠菌性阴道炎效果优于制霉菌素组,其用药简单,对胎儿影响小,是临床可以选择的治疗药物。Objective To evaluate clinical efficacy of treating vaginal candidiasiswithvaginal andcandidiasis respectively. Methods A total of 277 patients with vaginal candidiasis at our obstetric outpatient depatrment from March in 2004 to October in 2008 were equally randomized into two groups： A group used mycostatin and B group used canesten. All patients were followed up and diversifications are received carefully. Results There were 84 patients by 50. 36 percent of all cured in B group and 70 patients by 60. 37 percent of all in A group. Statistical analysis outcome（ χ2 = 10. 380,P 0. 05） revealed that the difference between curative effect in 2 groups were statistical significance. Conclusion Canesten with simple usage and no side effect is a better method to cure gestation vaginal candidiasis than costatin.

关 键 词：凯妮汀 制霉菌素 妊娠期 念珠菌性阴道炎 

分 类 号：R714.25[医药卫生—妇产科学] R711.3[医药卫生—临床医学]