检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东医学院第二附属医院消化科,广东湛江524003
出 处:《河北医学》2010年第8期901-902,共2页Hebei Medicine
摘 要:目的:总结ERCP在胆胰疾病中的诊断价值与B超及CT诊断的区别。方法:回顾分析168例临床经ERCP诊断的胆管和胰腺疾病。结果:ERCP对胆管癌、胆总管囊肿和壶腹部癌的确诊率均为100%,ERCP对胆管结石的确诊率为96.9%。而B超协同CT联合诊断胆管癌为33.3%;壶腹部癌57.1%,胆管结石为81.2%。结论:ERCP对胆管结石、胆管癌和壶腹部癌的诊断明显优B超和CT。Objective: To summarize ERCP experience in the diagnosis of diseases of pancreas and choledochus.Method: We reviewed and analysed 168 cases clinical biliary tract and pancreatic disease diagnosed by ERCP.Result: ERCP,the definite diagnosis rate to the malignant tumors of the bile duct;the congenital biliary cystic dilatation;the carcinoma of ampulla was 100%.The definite diagnosis rate to the bile duct calculus was 96.9%.And B-mode ultrasonic,CT jointly diagnoses the malignant tumors of the bile ducte was 33.3%;the carcinoma of ampulla was 57.1%.The duct calculus was 81.2%.Conclusion:ERCP,to the bile duct calculus;the malgnant tumors of bile duct and the carcinoma of ampulla are superior to B-mode ultrasonic and CT.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15