石介《春秋说》佚文考论  

Study on lost articles of Shi Jie’s Dissertation on The Annals of Spring and Autumn

作　　者：黄觉弘[1] 

机构地区：[1]江汉大学人文学院,湖北武汉430056

出　　处：《中南大学学报（社会科学版）》2010年第4期15-20,共6页Journal of Central South University：Social Sciences

基　　金：中国博士后科学基金资助项目"唐宋<春秋>佚说研究"(20080431111)

摘　　要：石介对《春秋》素有研治,撰有《春秋说》一书。考多种宋元《春秋》著述曾征引"石氏曰",而这些"石氏曰"即指石介之说,应该都是出自今已无从获睹的《春秋说》。就诸书所引,综加辑考,得《春秋说》佚文凡八十四条。这些佚文是研究石介其人其学以及宋初《春秋》学发展演变的宝贵材料。从佚文来看,《春秋说》原书体例大概是先条列所要阐释的经文,再次以解说,形同札记。石介与孙复一样皆不专主一家,对三传及诸家注说皆有取有弃。在褒贬问题上,石介贬多褒少,亦与孙复近似。在具体经说上,《春秋说》佚文与孙复说相同和互补者占据绝大多数,足见二人《春秋》学存在着广泛的一致性。不过,石介仍然有着自己独到的思考,并非亦步亦趋。Shi Jie had long studied The Annals of Spring and Autumn, various of writings of the The Spring and Autumn Annals in Song and Yuan dynasties had cited ＂What Shi has said＂, and ＂What Shi has said＂ referred to Shi Jie＇s dissertation, which ought to come from Dissertation on The Annals of Spring and Autumn which had already been lost.Judging from what various of books have cited, the author synthetically gets 84 lost articles of Dissertation on The Annals of Spring and Autumn which are the precious materials to study Shi Jie＇s theory and ihe evolution of The Annals of Spring and Autumn in the early of Song dynasty. From the lost articles, the original book of Dissertation on The Annals of Spring and Autumn generally listed the articles that ought to be explained. Just like Sun Fu, Shi Jie not only concentrated on The Annals of Spring and Autumn, but also studied others things such as Zuo Zhuan, Gong-Yang Zhuan and Gu-Liang Zhuan which was considered as a collection called three Chuan, and other scholars＇ postils and theories. And for the idiographic texts, many of Shi＇s lost articles of Dissertation on The Annals of Spring and Autumn were the same or complementary. It was obvious that there is comprehensive coherence between their theory. Though they had many same points, Shi still had his own special view points.

关 键 词：石介 孙复 《春秋说》 《春秋尊王发微》 

分 类 号：G256[文化科学—图书馆学] K244[历史地理—历史学]