肝储备功能分析仪两种探头使用的比较  被引量:1

Comparison of finger probes and nose probes in measurement of liver reserve function

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:黄羽频[1] 陈梅先[1] 林雪英[1] 

机构地区:[1]中山大学肿瘤防治中心肝胆科,广州510060

出  处:《中华现代护理杂志》2010年第21期2575-2577,共3页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing

摘  要:目的比较肝储备功能分析仪鼻夹探头和手指探头的优劣。方法回顾性分析1902例行肝储备功能检查——吲哚菁绿15min潴留率(ICGR15)病例,比较鼻夹探头和手指探头的使用效果。结果得出手指探头的检测失败率和不良反应发生率明显低于鼻夹探头。结论肝储备功能分析仪使用手指探头进行检测时效果好,且操作简便,还可减轻患者的心理障碍,使其更舒适和易于接受,便于临床推广。Objective To compare finger probes and nose probes in measurement of liver reserve function. Methods This paper retrospectively summarized 1902 cases received liver reserve function test (indocyanine green retention at 15min, ICGR15 ). The failure rate and adverse reaction incidence of ICG test were compared between using finger probes and using nose probes during inspected. Results Using finger probes had lower failure rate and adverse reaction incidence than using nose probes. Conclusions Using finger probes in liver reserve function test is effectiveness, easy operation and can reduce psychological disorders for patients.

关 键 词:肝储备功能分析化 ICGR15 探头 

分 类 号:R657.3[医药卫生—外科学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象