日美贸易摩擦中三大谈判机制的对比研究  

A Comparative Analysis on the Three Main Negotiation Mechanisms in Japan-U.S.Trade Frictions

作　　者：贺平[1] 周英华[2] 

机构地区：[1]复旦大学日本研究中心,上海200433 [2]宁波职业技术学院外语系,浙江宁波315800

出　　处：《东北亚论坛》2010年第5期74-82,共9页Northeast Asia Forum

基　　金：2006年教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目"经贸摩擦与大国关系--日美与中美经贸摩擦的对比研究"(06JAGJW003);2008年国家社会科学基金资助项目"区域性国际公共产品理论与中国的东亚合作战略"(08BG5019);2009年复旦大学亚洲研究中心2009年度资助项目

摘　　要："市场导向的个别领域谈判"、"日美结构性障碍协议"、"日美经济框架对话"是战后日美双方缓解贸易摩擦的三大谈判机制。对三大谈判机制及其各自内部子议题的对比研究发现,贸易谈判中外压强度和谈判有效性之间并不存在对称关系。在这些谈判机制中,美国对日外压与日本国内的内压之间形成了动态的双层博弈。内压的结构与价值诉求、利益指向是分析贸易谈判的重要变量。The MOSS talks, the Structural Impediments Initiative, and the Japan - U. S. Framework Talks are the three main negotiation mechanisms for Japan and the U.S. to alleviate trade conflicts after World War II. The comparative analysis among these three mechanisms and their sub - issues demonstrates that the relationship between the intensity of foreign trade pressure and the effectiveness of trade negotiations is asymmetrical. The main reason is that each mechanism constitutes a second -level game. The interaction of foreign pressure imposed by the United States and the domestic pressure within Japan forms a dynamic two - level game. In dissecting trade negotiations, it is essential to probe into the domestic variables such as the nature of naiastu appeal, the interests of naiatsu, and its structure and composition.

关 键 词：市场导向的个别领域谈判 日美结构性障碍协议 日美经济框架对话 贸易谈判机制 外压 内压 

分 类 号：F740[经济管理—国际贸易]