鲁迅与库切小说的文体比较  

A Stylistic Comparison between Lu Xun's and Coetzee's Novels

作　　者：石杰[1] 

机构地区：[1]渤海大学学报编辑部,辽宁锦州121013

出　　处：《贵州大学学报（社会科学版）》2010年第4期113-117,共5页Journal of Guizhou University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：2009年辽宁省教育厅人文社会科学研究基金项目[项目编号:2009A010]

摘　　要：鲁迅与库切都是重视文体的作家,在文体实践上也表现出鲜明的一致性。这不仅体现为对自传性和改写体小说的择定,更在于每种体式的具体表现形态。自传性小说虽以作家的经历事实为主,也不乏虚构成分,是纪实与虚构的交融;改写体小说虽保留了原本的基本或部分内容,却更致力于创造,是对原本意义的颠覆和消解。从中可以见出后现代历史观对库切的深刻影响,以及鲁迅思想和创作的超前性。Both Lu Xun and Coetzee pay great attention to literary style and share distinct consistency in literary practice, which are reflected not only in the choices between autobiography and rewriting novels, but also in the specific formation of each literary form. Although autobiography is mainly based on the author＇s experiences, they are not completely free from made-up stories, a blend of the record of actual events and the made-up stories. Although rewriting novels have kept the basic or partial original elements, they demonstrate more taste of crea- tion. They are the subversion and counteraction of the original meaning. Coetzee is deeply influenced by postmodem views of history, by Lu Xun＇s thought and with creation ahead of times.

关 键 词：鲁迅 库切 文体 自传 改写 

分 类 号：I210[文学—中国文学]