中国现代文学史的“扭摆舞”——对夏志清《中国现代小说史》、范伯群《中国近现代通俗文学史》等的批评  

"Frug" in Modern Chinese Literary History: Criticism on Xia Zhiqing’s Zhongguo Xiandai Xiaoshuoshi and Fan Boqun’s Zhongguo Jinxiandai Tongsu Wenxueshi

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:袁良骏[1] 

机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院文学研究所,北京100732

出  处:《汕头大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2010年第4期5-13,34,共10页Journal of Shantou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)

摘  要:中国现代文学史的撰写已经有86年的历史,史著已先后出版了150余部,对其研究的专著也出现了3部。王瑶的《中国新文学史稿》是一部适应中国革命需要的"左"派文学史,夏志清的《中国现代小说史》有鲜明的"冷战"背景,对王著进行了根本性的颠覆。范伯群的《中国近现代通俗文学史》改善了王著的"左派"倾向,给了鸳蝴派作家作品的新的认识和评价,然提出的"两个翅膀论"却令人遗憾地矫枉过正了。The compilation of the modern Chinese literary history has had eighty-six years, and there have been altogether over 150 books on this history, and also three monographs about its research. Zhongguo xiandai wenxueshi (Modern Chinese Literary History) by Wang Yao was the first 'life-wing' literary historical book adapted to the demands of the Chinese revolution. Zhongguo xiandai xiaoshuoshi (History of Modern Chinese Fiction) by Xia Zhiqing was obviously set in 'cold war,' subverting radically the root of Wang Yao’s book. Zhongguo jinxiandai tongsu wenxueshi (History of Popular Literature of Modern China) by Fan Boqun made some remedy for Wang Yao’s book, offering new insight and comments upon the writers in Hudiepai (School of Butterflies); however, its idea of 'two wings' went too far, thus being incorrect.

关 键 词:中国现代文学史 中国现代文学研究史 王瑶 夏志清 范伯群 学术批评 

分 类 号:I206.6[文学—中国文学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象