大学生状态、特质焦虑与刷新功能的关系  

Relationship Between State/Trait Anxiety and Memory Updating in College Students

作　　者：王晓霞[1] 冯正直[1] 

机构地区：[1]第三军医大学护理学院心理学教研室,重庆400038

出　　处：《中国临床心理学杂志》2010年第4期426-428,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology

基　　金：国家自然科学基金资助(30970898)

摘　　要：目的:探讨大学生状态和特质焦虑与刷新功能的关系。方法:采用活动任务范式对高、低特质和状态焦虑被试的数字和类词刷新功能进行测量。结果:①数字刷新实验,任务难度的主效应显著,特质焦虑和状态焦虑的主效应不显著,特质焦虑、状态焦虑和任务难度各因素之间交互作用均不显著;②类词刷新实验,情绪条件和状态焦虑的主效应显著,特质焦虑的主效应不显著,特质焦虑、状态焦虑和情绪条件各因素之间交互作用均不显著。结论:①状态焦虑和特质焦虑对记忆刷新的作用是分离的:高状态焦虑降低类词刷新成绩,但不影响数字刷新成绩;特质焦虑不影响刷新成绩;②特质和状态焦虑个体的类词刷新存在负性情绪偏向。Objective：To explore the feature of memory updating in college students with state and trait anxiety.Methods：College students with high and low SA（state anxiety）and TA（trait anxiety） were screened,their number and category-word updating performance were examined by keeping track task.Results：The main effect of task difficulty level on number updating was significant（P0.05）.The main effect of emotional valence and SA on category-word updating was significant（P0.05）.In number updating,the interactive effects of any two or all of the three factors,SA,TA and difficulty level were insignificant（P0.05）.In category-word updating,the interactive effects of any two or all of the three factors,SA,TA and emotional valence were insignificant（P0.05）.Conclusion：Individuals with high SA are deficit in number updating.No significant correlation is found between TA and updating performance in number updating and category-word updating.SA and TA independently impact on memory updating.Both SA and TA cause biased updating response to negative emotional stimulus.

关 键 词：焦虑 执行功能 记忆刷新 情绪偏向 

分 类 号：R395.1[哲学宗教—心理学]