攻击问卷在中国967名男犯中的信效度检验  

Reliability and Validity of the Aggression Questionnaire in 967 Chinese Male Prisoners

作　　者：李丽[1] 席焕久[2] 牛志民[3] 温有锋[2] 杜雪[2] 

机构地区：[1]辽宁医学院心理健康教育教研室,辽宁锦州121001 [2]辽宁医学院人类学研究所,辽宁锦州121001 [3]辽宁医学院法学教研室

出　　处：《中国临床心理学杂志》2010年第4期455-456,459,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology

基　　金：国家自然科学基金(30840047/c0710)资助

摘　　要：目的:修订攻击问卷,考察其信效度,为其在中国男犯中的应用提供理论依据。方法:对967名中国男犯进行攻击问卷测试。结果:①验证性因素分析表明修订后问卷具有较好的结构效度(χ2/df=3.302,GFI、IFI、CFI>0.90,RMSEA=0.049);②独立样本t检验表明,攻击组各因子及总分均高于对照组(P<0.001);③问卷各项目与所属因子间均有显著相关,相关系数在0.568～0.752之间;④总问卷Cronbachα系数为0.884,6周后身体攻击、言语攻击、愤怒、敌意和总问卷重测信度依次为0.765,0.608,0.712,0.743,0.783。结论:修订后的攻击问卷具有较好的信效度。Objective：To revise the Aggression Questionnaire,to examine the reliability and validity,and to provide theoretical basis for Chinese male prisoners.Methods：967 Chinese male prisoners took part in the Aggression Questionnaire survey.Results：①Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed that the revised Aggression Questionnaire had good construct validity（χ2/df=3.302,GFI、IFI、CFI0.90,RMSEA=0.049）.②The aggressive group had higher scores in all of the four factors than in the normal group.③There were significant relations between questionnaire＇s items and factors.Correlation coefficient were from 0.568 to 0.752.④Total score＇s Cronbach α was 0.884.The retest reliabilities including physical aggression,verbal aggression,anger,hostility,and total score＇s Cronbach α were 0.765,0.608,0.712,0.743,0.783 after six weeks.Conclusion：The revised Aggression Questionnaire has good reliability and validity.

关 键 词：攻击行为 攻击问卷 男犯 验证性因素分析 

分 类 号：R395.1[哲学宗教—心理学]