检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陆丽[1]
出 处:《安徽卫生职业技术学院学报》2010年第4期72-72,50,共2页Journal of Anhui Health Vocational & Technical College
摘 要:目的:通过浅静脉留置针反向静脉穿刺与顺向穿刺对比,寻找减轻患者痛苦提高静脉穿刺成功率的穿刺方法。方法:抽取200例住院患者随机分为试验组和对照组,对两组一次穿刺成功率进行分析。结果:留置针反向穿刺一次穿刺成功率高。结论:留置针反向穿刺能有效地利用血管,减轻病人痛苦,提高静脉穿刺成功率,减少护士工作量。Objective: To find effective puncture method of less pain and higher success rate with intravenous catheter in clinical application, we compared reverse vein puncture with along vein puncture. Methods: 200 patients grouped experiential and control group with randomized control trail (RCT), the success or failure cases at the first puncture and phlebitis occurred cases were carefully observed and wrote down under the corresponding table. Chi-square test was used to inspect the significance difference in the two groups. Results: The success rate of the first puncture has significance difference between the two groups: reverse puncture is 97 percent, along vein puncture is 84 percent (x2 equals 4.187, P0.05).And the rate of phlebitis occurrence has no significance difference (x2 equals 1.692, P 0.05).Conclusion:Reverse puncture can increase the success rate at the first puncture without increasing the rate of phlebitis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117